Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  276 / 300 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 276 / 300 Next Page
Page Background

Furse, Wilford Road, Nottingham, NG2 1EB • Tel: +44 (0)115 964 3700 • Email:

enquiry@furse.com

• Web:

www.furse.com

TSC-0912 - 09.10.12

Guide to BS EN/IEC 62305

BS EN/IEC 62305-3

Non-conventional air

termination systems

A lot of technical (and commercial) debate has raged

over the years regarding the validity of the claims

made by the proponents of such systems.

This topic was discussed extensively within

the technical working groups that compiled

BS EN/IEC 62305. The outcome was to remain with

the information housed within this standard.

BS EN/IEC 62305 states unequivocally that the volume

or zone of protection afforded by the air termination

system (e.g. air rod) shall be determined only by the

real physical dimension of the air termination system.

This statement is reinforced within the 2011 version of

BS EN 62305, by being incorporated in the body of the

standard, rather than forming part of an Annex

(Annex A of BS EN/IEC 62305-3:2006).

Typically if the air rod is 5 m tall then the only claim for

the zone of protection afforded by this air rod would

be based on 5 m and the relevant class of LPS and not

any enhanced dimension claimed by some non-

conventional air rods.

There is no other standard being contemplated to run

in parallel with this standard BS EN/IEC 62305.

Natural components

When metallic roofs are being considered as a natural

air termination arrangement, then BS 6651 gave

guidance on the minimum thickness and type of

material under consideration.

BS EN/IEC 62305-3 gives similar guidance as well as

additional information if the roof has to be

considered puncture proof from a lightning discharge

(see Table 10).

The mesh method

This is the method that was most commonly used

under the recommendations of BS 6651. Again, within

BS EN/IEC 62305 four different air termination mesh

sizes are defined and correspond to the relevant class

of LPS (see Table 9).

This method is suitable where plain surfaces require

protection if the following conditions are met:

Air termination conductors must be positioned at

roof edges, on roof overhangs and on the ridges of

roof with a pitch in excess of 1 in 10 (5.7º)

No metal installation protrudes above the air

termination system

Modern research on lightning inflicted damage has

shown that the edges and corners of roofs are most

susceptible to damage.

So on all structures particularly with flat roofs,

perimeter conductors should be installed as close to

the outer edges of the roof as is practicable.

As in BS 6651, the current standard permits the use of

conductors (whether they be fortuitous metalwork or

dedicated LP conductors) under the roof. Vertical air

rods (finials) or strike plates should be mounted above

the roof and connected to the conductor system

beneath. The air rods should be spaced not more than

10 m apart and if strike plates are used as an

alternative, these should be strategically placed over

the roof area not more than 5 m apart.

Class of LPS

Mesh size

(m)

I

5 x 5

II

10 x 10

III

15 x 15

IV

20 x 20

Table 9: Maximum values of mesh size corresponding to

the Class of LPS

Figure 19: Concealed air termination network

Concealed

conductor

Vertical air

termination

Down conductor

Class of LPS

Material

Thickness

(1)

t (mm)

Thickness

(2)

t’ (mm)

I to IV

Lead

-

2.0

Steel (stainless,

galvanized)

4

0.5

Titanium

4

0.5

Copper

5

0.5

Aluminium

7

0.65

Zinc

-

0.7

Table 10: Minimum thickness of metal sheets or metal pipes in air

termination systems (BS EN/IEC 62305-3 Table 3)

(1) Thickness t prevents puncture, hot spot or ignition.

(2) Thickness t’ only for metal sheets if it is not important to prevent

puncture, hot spot or ignition problems.